<p>
</p>
<p>My mistake… CMC isn’t Pomona College nor Harvey Mudd wrt admissions. I know you’re trying to be cute, but you should be able to see my comparisons would be more relevant between three of the Claremont colleges. ;)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Do you not realize that bluebayou made the conclusion that CMC’s admissions is tougher than UCLA’s by solely the 25th% level SAT, which we know for a fact that this would be as comparing apples and oranges? </p>
<p>Bluebayou said, something to the effect that: “There’s nothing wrong with CMC being tougher to gain admission to, drax” after he misunderstood my first reply to his. I still don’t think he understands what I’ve proposed. </p>
<p>I think, rather, that his superficial conclusions based on one item shows that he couldn’t piece together a more cogent conclusion than a five year old. He’ll probably accuse me on an ad hominem, but would edit: have conveniently ignored yours.</p>
<p>The three things which UCLA does to understate SAT would be most relevant to the bottom quartile SAT’s because score replacement and elimination would affect this set the most (… but similarly not my example becasue the BGHS student only took the SAT once). If you are similarly unable to see this, then I can’t help you, either.</p>
<p>I still stand by my statements: UCLA should be tougher in which to gain admission than CMC. They live in different worlds, however, and neither really has any significant commonality in admissions decisions with the other.</p>
<p>But you’re free to pick my arguments apart, if you wish, but expect a reply in return.</p>