@DogsAndMath23 your numbers from athletic.net are way off. Maybe you’re looking at 2018? There were probably several hundred girls under 5 in the 1600 last spring when you add in converted 1500s. @Chembiodad has posted good guidance.
@DogsAndMath23 your numbers from athletic.net are way off. Maybe you’re looking at 2018? There were probably several hundred girls under 5 in the 1600 last spring when you add in converted 1500s. @Chembiodad has posted good guidance.