<p>Interesting… i didn’t see that.</p>
<p>the rest of the line is… “…It still remains a plausible model; plausible, but yet incapable of proof”</p>
<p>Indeed. It’s like one sentence supports one answer, then the following sentence supports the other answer. Seriously w t f.</p>
<p>Oh wait:
“as yet incapable of proof” AS YET!!! Only AS YET!! Means there is hope for it to be proven in the future!!! Now i am even more strongly convinced the answer is “probably”.</p>
<p>edit: @user you got the quote wrong. It’s “as yet” not just “yet”. HUGE difference in meaning.</p>
<p>I’m not convinced. The passage specifically talks about the paradox of people believing in something that didn’t exist.</p>
<p>^^^^ Be careful how you describe the paradox. It was more accurately that people believed strongly in something they couldn’t be sure existed.</p>
<p>I think the question we’re talking about here referred specifically to the last paragraph of the passage where it said something about it not being disproved by any evidence therefore the author is inclined to believe it. Even though that might not logically make sense, that’s what the passage said and I think that’s what we were supposed to interpret for the answer.</p>
<p>I think the question referred to the entire passage, but was maybe designed for the last paragraph.</p>
<p>yah i agree with wedgedawg. i dont think the author is trying to disprove the validity of the war; he just wants to bring out the argument that we still dont have any solid evidence to really go against the fact that trojan might have happened. But then again, i could be wrong. >_<</p>
<p>Even though your arguments are convincing, I think collegeboard’s answer is still didn’t exist bleh</p>
<p>Why did they have to so ambiguous TWICE on the CR?</p>