<p>
</p>
<p>That is very true, most military assignments are 3 yrs, and typically, many commanders take this position as their last stop out. The commander that you start with will most likely not be the one you end with. Also as a gmac you will have very little interaction with the commander.</p>
<p>When I stated Berkeley it is for the same reason of Columbia since the OP’s son is interested in govt and politics. As a Mom of a ROTC student in govt and politics, most profs in this arena are more left leaning. Our DS has been called out many times to defend the military by profs in an antagonistic way. Everything from the 22 issue to the military interrogations. He’s a kid and has no real inner workings of the military at this point, but is expected to defend since he is ROTC.</p>
<p>The school is really the most important, but ROTC students also change during their college yrs like every other kid. The difference is as they go up the ROTC ladder, their education still matters, but the ROTC part starts to become more important. There are many reasons for this occurrence.
- Their soph to jr yr they will go to Military Sleep Away camp :D. Their entire sophomore yr is to prepare them for that. When they return they now have the sense of this is their future for at least 5 yrs.
- Their jr yr is wen they start getting “true” leadership positions, which takes time away from school, and more towards ROTC.
- They receive their track in the spring of their jr. yr. This means they know what their career will be for the next 5 yrs.
- Their senior yr, they have even more leadership positions, and by spring they also know where they are going as in post/base. While their non-ROTC friends are trying to decide grad school or real world.</p>
<p>All of these things change kids. I have seen the difference in our own DS. He still has his best bud, but as DS is joining the AF frat and his friend is joining a greek frat, their friendship is mutating. DS is realizing that the kids in AFROTC understand his fears, whereas, his bud doesn’t. It is hard for a friend to understand why you are freaking if your gpa is lower than a 3.5. For AFROTC cadets, they get it, because the higher gpa, the higher you are on the selection list. His future career rides on his gpa. Also, DS is not a prude, but he knows that there is a no drinking policy at UMD, if he is caught drunk it could be the end of his military career before it ever starts, so when he sees people getting sloppy drunk, he gets out of there quick, and for that he takes heat. Finally, he realizes through his dad, that many of these ROTC friends will be with you at UPT and for the rest of your life. Thus, it becomes the situation of growing up and moving on.</p>
<p>As far as libs and mods in the military. There are mod dems, just like mod republicans, but you do not trip over them, as in there are tons. Typically the liberal viewpoint does not easily translate into the military format. There is no democracy in the military. Your boss always is right! You do not have a voice in the military. You cannot go and protest against the leadership without doing harm to your military career. There is an old joke in the military…put your hand on your shoulder as the other person puts theirs on their shoulder, not flip your hand over. Whoever has the higher rank wins. it is known as RHIP (Rank Has Its Priviledges)… Also, as much as I believe there are libs, they are very quiet about their political belief, because the majority are not. According to studies, the military is 75-80% republican…that also explains why the 00 Florida election had the wrinkle about the military vote, and Norm Koleman wanted the late absentee ballots from the military to be counted. Finally, the big reason most military are republicans, because traditionally, the republican party supports the military budget, whereas, the dems do not. Thus, if is your paycheck and your benefits, and your life at risk, that will become your priority, and you tend to vote with the party that agrees with your top issue.</p>
<p>I know of 2 friends that came in as dems, lts in 96, they both took tons of heat for backing Clinton. When we retired last yr, those 2 guys were no longer dems. Did they change because of mob mentality or the fact that they did not like the party anymore, I don’t know, but I do know that they both did say that after living the life, they saw it from a different view 15 yrs later.</p>