<p>
</p>
<p>These aren’t my definitions. I’m only reporting what the schools themselves report on their Common Data Sets, a portion of which also gets republished in US News. (And no, mom2collegekids, I’m not “misusing stats,” I’m only telling you what the colleges themselves report; if I had more detailed breakouts on financial aid for in-state v. out-of-state students, for example, I’d gladly report that here, but since the colleges don’t report that on their CDS, I can’t reproduce it here. But in the meantimes I’ll ask you to please refrain from the ad hominems; they contribute nothing useful to the discussion).</p>
<p>My understanding is that “percent of need met” on the Common Data Set is based on financial aid from all sources (federal, state, institutional, and “external,” i.e., outside scholarships reported to and/or administered by the school). This would include both grant/scholarship aid as well as “self-help” aid, which on the CDS includes both need-based loans (e.g., federal subsidized Stafford loans, but not unsubsidized Stafford loans which are available without a showing of need) and need-based work-study money.</p>
<p>I also don’t consider loans and work-study genuine “aid.” Loans are only an alternative way of paying, spreading the cost over a longer period, with interest. They may help a student over a financial hurdle, but the student ends up paying in full, and more, in the long run. Work-study money isn’t free, either; the student needs to work for it, which she might be equally able to do in the private sector. Work-study doesn’t reduce the cost to the student, it only guarantees the student a minimum number of hours of paid work which might be used to help pay for that student’s education, but the student “pays” for it in time, effort, and opportunity cost, same as any other job. Nonetheless, the CDS allows (actually requires) colleges to count these categories as “need-based aid” along with need-based grants and scholarships, and they are included in the calculation of “percentage of need met.”</p>
<p>I think you’ll find if you examine a few colleges’ CDS (Section H, Financial Aid) you’ll see wide variance in the ratio of grant/scholarship aid to self-help aid, and in the sources of grant/scholarship money (federal, state, and institutional). For example, at UNC Chapel Hill, the ratio of need-based grant/scholarship aid to self-help aid is about 3.5 to 1 ($93.8 million in grants/scholarships to $27 million in self-help). At Auburn, that ratio is about 1 to 1.3 ($36.3 million in grants/scholarships to $47.6 million in self-help). The two schools benefit from similar amounts of federal grant aid (mostly Pell grants), $16.3 million at UNC and $14.8 million at Auburn. A big difference is that the state of North Carolina kicks in $12.7 million, while the state of Alabama contributes only $1.7 million in need-based grants. But the biggest difference is what the school itself contributes: $59.2 million in institutional need-based grants/scholarships at Carolina, compared to only $16.9 million in that category at Auburn.</p>