<p>
</p>
<p>First off, you’re absolutely right. Ignorant and stupid. My b.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Ummm, were we reading the same article??? If I remember correctly I think you’ve already been accepted, so perhaps you enjoy the Wake adcoms bashing their applicants from the secure vantage point of acceptance, but this is the same article that made the first responder reply upon reading it:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>When an article produces that effect, the school is either really good or really arrogant. I think we all know which one we’re dealing with. (I’m kidding, but honestly, if I was a dean of admissions, that’s not exactly the first response I’d want someone to have, especially someone who liked my school enough to apply in the first place.)</p>
<p>And back to the article: </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Are you kidding me?? That isn’t condescending???</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>a.) Going 2-14 in the ACC is not lackluster, it’s atrocious.
b.) What they believe is worse (between blinkers and genocide) doesn’t concern me. Ripping on applicants because they put what genuinely makes them upset and not what Ms. America would say does. It really is a good article to share though. Next year’s applicants will now know to respond with “world hunger” rather than something like “the quality of teaching at my high school.” Good stuff to know.</p>
<p>Wake is still my first choice and I’m known to have a dissenting opinion on most issues so don’t take this too personally or literally. Just my opinion.</p>