My point, dentmom4, was only that I don’t think its terribly difficult for in-state adcoms to adjust to seeing SAT scores as opposed to ACT scores…for the first year, they’d just correlate it to their previous SAT equivalencies.
This is one area where the amount of money spent isn’t particularly meaningful IMHO. If they can save 15 million on standardized testing, which to my mind contributes nothing to the classroom, well, why not? Use the money to lower the PTR, say I 