<p>dunno why are we arguing over this question. incensed is pretty evident in itself. BTW, does anyone agree with me that the last BAT passage question is answered with “humans relate more with sighted animals”?? Does anyone remember that the passage mentioned examples of sighted animals?</p>
<p>No, the answer to that question is: “its easier for humans to see” or something.</p>
<p>Do you remember that Math question with the Venn Diagram pertaining to those Clubs?
And we had to choose which ones of the 3 given options were right. What was the answer to that one? Does anyone remember the option?</p>
<p>@miasanmia, no offense, but with the rest of the answers you’ve been giving so far in this thread, I’m tempted to side with the answers you didn’t put. So the fact that you agree vehemently with “incensed” gives me more confidence in the other answer.</p>
<p>And no, that wasn’t the answer to that question. The answer is that “humans can see naturally and effortlessly”</p>
<p>Coldflame makes a good argument for “incensed” though, I’m still leaning towards uncomprehending, but I can see how incensed would work.</p>
<p>Only statement III is correct.</p>
<p>@coldflame
no point in arguing over this question anymore. if only we could see the passage again</p>
<p>@aphrodite
it should be III only</p>
<p>Anyone remember the maths quesion with the rectangle with two circles and points A B in side them with AB = 3, was the perimeter 2(2(3) + 3(3))</p>
<p>so 30?</p>
<p>the Sc question which the answer is “eclectic” can anybody explain for me @@ since I don’t remember that question and if you guy can remember any other choice</p>
<p>^other choices were elliptical and some others.</p>
<p>@Maxyend Thats right. The answer was 30. 18 + 12 I think.</p>
<p>@Thuy95 I don’t remember exactly but I think the question was about native Indians(?) and their culture and everything was diverse and coming from a lot of places or wtv. Hence, eclectic.</p>
<p>@maxyend
no offense taken. its obvious we interpret the passages differently. your arguments do not convince me otherwise of my faults anyways. And i must disagree VEHEMENTLY with your answer choice “humans can see effortlessly”. That is a pretty stupid answer tbh imo. I have no idea why so many have chosen it. first of all not all humans can see effortlessly. there are humans that are born blind. man if only we could see the passage again</p>
<p>Its definitely “humans can see effortlessly”, no doubt about that. The passage clearly mentioned that humans found the actions that they could do more believable in animals (in this case vision) Vision comes to humans effortlessly so it is more believable to them that animals can see.</p>
<p>Any guesses on the curve guys – especially for critical reading?</p>
<p>the bats passage says that we cannot understand bat’s behavior cz we are not capable of it. thus we have no difficult in believing birds can see because we can effortlessly see.</p>
<p>@aphrodite
the last part of your argument supports my answer choice completely. i think “humans can see effortlessly” is just missing the big picture. The passage definitely mentioned animals with sight as examples.</p>
<p>i think the CR is hard!! harder than the May one. Should be generous than that!</p>
<p>@zjyagenla
this may be extrapolating a bit but your argument would then support a previous answer choice “we may never comprehend how bats communicate”, if indeed what you said what mentioned in the passage. but i think the question was more specific and your answer would’ve been inappropriate for it. just my pov</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure this was the more appropriate choice of the two.
And this is def not a stupid answer choice. very much plausible.</p>
<p>looks like this one will remain a mystery until the answers are out. but thank god that section is experimental. the one with the bat was experimental, no?</p>