<p>And those of us who believe in evolution wouldn’t be so annoyed about creationism if its supporters weren’t trying so hard to have it taught as “science” in public schools. It’s not science. </p>
<p>Good theories should pass Occam’s razor test…
The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory.</p>
<p>Creationism is basically one big assumption, with no concrete scientific proof to back it up. Evolution does actually have scientific backing, and can be used to predict future occurrences (a principle tenet of a scientific “theory”) unlike Creationism. It may not be perfect (yet) but it’s certainly a better alternative to the Bible.</p>