Is MIT losing it?

<p>

</p>

<p>I’m saying it’s old. Just like the NRC ranking is old. Things change. I’m sure I could dig up an old ranking that shows MIT ranked above Stanford too, but would that prove anything to you? Didn’t think so. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Which is still an unclear point to me. Nobody disputes that Stanford has produced many technologies. The question is, whether they are truly THE leader. That remains unproven. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Uh, what’s wrong with this picture? So you choose not to mention MIT’s contributions to anything, and then you say that you want others to play fair? You started it, my friend. I’m just following the rules that you set forth - if you feel so free to neglect MIT’s contributions, then I should feel free to neglect Stanford’s contributions. What’s fair is fair. You can’t just keep changing the rules to suit your own purposes. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Uh, wasn’t most of the minicomputer revolution (i.e. DEC, Prime, Apollo etc.) of the 1970’s and 1980’s centered around Highway 128? Heck, I believe DEC was the 2nd largest computer company in the world (after IBM) until the late 1980’s. Wasn’t the Free Software Foundation founded by MIT people?</p>