<p>Did you mean “very low ranking” by U.S. News & World standards? PR reports that 77% of their grads go on to graduate school. Enrollment is 69% African American according to PR, but 97% according to College Board. Admission is not selective, yet graduates are apparently well-prepared, particularly in science and engineering – a focus Washington Monthly emphasizes as nationally important.</p>
<p>I don’t know the school. But I wonder if it’s hasty to dismiss the WM ratings as any less salient than, say, USNWR?</p>
<p>I say, the more rankings - and the more they diverge - the better. Anything that makes inroads into the herd mentality that sends kids mindlessly applying to the “top 20” schools based on nothing but USN&WR is good in my book. Shake-ups that put “unranked” schools high on the WM list, or Alabama A&M way higher than what the Gospel is According to USN&WR are all to the good. This kind of ratings dissonance gets people thinking and talking about what goes into the ratings and what a given school might have to offer.</p>
<p>The ratings are handy; I use them myself. But they should just be a starting point and too many of our cc kids (especially) are beholden to them.</p>
<p>I also plan to buy a hardcopy of the WM rankings. It is refreshing to see a results-oriented approach to rankings. </p>
<p>BTW - “Is Our Children Learning” is a very interesting little book by Paul Begala. Begala is an alum of University of Texas Law School where GWB applied and was rejected prior to being admitted to Harvard Business School. This fact alone ranks UT above Harvard in my book.</p>