Is the academic perception of Football Powerhouses hurt by their football popularity?

<p>

</p>

<p>I wasn’t the one who brought up the “other stuff” (yield rates, etc.); the fact of the matter is that standardized test scores for student body at ND is pretty similar to that of Stanford, and yet, the academic requirements for FB recruits at ND is a bit lower than that for FB recruits at Stanford.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I’m not talking about a threshold that would guarantee acceptance; however, Stanford generally required a minimum score of 1100 on the SATs (2 part) for FB recruits.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>And higher rated recruits tend to have lesser academic qualifications; besides, it’s a bit too coincidental.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Uhh, how would the admissions staff know who is and who isn’t a higher rated recruit - unless the coaching staff informs them?</p>

<p>And I’m sure recruits like Ricky Seale (3.3 GPA and 1450 SAT/3 part) got admitted on the basis of their essays and recommendations.</p>