<p>15.8% versus 11.3% definitely suggests “rampant”. Nrdsb4, I am talking about effect size here, and correlation. There are multiple components to hiring, and I didn’t say other traits were taken out of the equation.</p>
<p>Let’s remember that the experiment used fake resumes to submit to companies. In addition to making a lot of other comparisons, they compared “native” versus “Group 1”, which had the exact same qualifications but differed only in their last name. </p>
<p>Remember it’s 15.8% versus 11.3%, not 15.8% and zero. Let’s not use straw man tactics. :)</p>