<p>I think I MIGHT have gone to Stanford, but then again I have the advantage of hindsight and some years out of school to show me what matters: certainly not the name.</p>
<p>Stanford might have opened a couple of doors that UCLA won’t, but it’s not like I’d be rolling in jobs now had I gone there instead of UCLA.</p>
<p>For the record, Stanford DOES have some big courses, but not as many as UCLA. We do okay, though, compared to other top schools. To my mind, the worst negative of UCLA is actually the rather lazy student body (RELATIVE to other schools.) I suspect that beautiful weather and bountiful opportunities lead to lazyarsed students.</p>