<p>@flowerhead- You’re trying to say you didn’t commit an ad hominem and your explanation for how you didn’t commit one was that you implied boston was wrong because he was unqualified. Wow. That’s a load of fail.</p>
<p>You then provided links with explanations as to what ad hominem is without exhibiting how it helps prove your point. I’ll go ahead and use the links for you:</p>
<p>
Boston1993 provided his interpretation on law school admissions. You argued that since Boston1993 is 17 years old, his advice is useless. </p>
<p>
What does someone’s age have anything to do with the validity of their argument? </p>
<p>Thanks for the links by the way.</p>
<p>The only reason you gave up was because you have no idea what you’re talking about. You then randomly changed the subject to focus on the definition of “et cetera”. Don’t act like the only reason you stopped is because the argument is beneath you.</p>