<p>I agree about context. But it seems to me that based on what I hear of Pott’s raw gift, my comments would be the same whatever the context. I have heard another clip of the singer, and the flaws exist there too. I sincerely do not wish to be mean here, but it seems to me there is a fundamental lack of authority in the voice, an instability particularly in the lower register that will stick with him whatever he tries. I do believe that with a lot more work, and more careful selection of material, he could do well. But I just do not hear the all around greatness or ‘amazingness’ that so many people apparently think exists.</p>
<p>[Here</a> is actually the Bjorling recording I had in mind](<a href=“http://www.amazon.com/Artists-Century-Bjorling-Ultimate-Collection/dp/B00000J911]Here”>http://www.amazon.com/Artists-Century-Bjorling-Ultimate-Collection/dp/B00000J911) when I posted on him. I have it, and have just spent some time listening. Pure joy. You simply doubt nothing the guy says, regardless of the register in which he says it. Someone was kind enough to post the ND from this recording. It is even more intense than the rendition I posted earlier. it is also digitally re-mastered so that you might get an idea of just how fantastic his voice and interpretations are. [Check</a> it out.](<a href=“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUbA5y1hnFg]Check”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUbA5y1hnFg) The quality of voice, the total dominance and control here are all unmistakable, and would exist under almost all circumstances. Please understand that I really don’t want to take anything from Potts. But folks are claiming this guy is the next Pavarotti. It is a little ridiculous, don’t you agree? In truth, there are a lot of young cats who are so much better developed and who no one even knows. These guys have Pavarotti and Bjorling and Corelli and Caruso in view, and they are hitting far closer to them than Potts ever will. I think Potts is flowing along on his story, and that is quite fine. I am pleased to see it. But I think we ought to keep in touch with reality and not cheapen it by claiming Potts is it. Bjorling is the reality.</p>
<p>I also don’t like to claim one guy is “better” than another, at least not on the Corelli, Pavarotti, Bjorling, etc. level. Sometimes I just want to hear Del Monaco and not Pavarotti or Domingo. Sometimes Corelli, Domingo or Pavarotti are the ways I want to go. But in their light I cannot see how anyone would want to go to the shadows of Paul Potts at this point because the voice is still far too undeveloped, light, and unsure.</p>
<p>I will say this, Potts has a naturally sweet voice – [but</a> if I want sweet, I would really just go all out for it](<a href=“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fdgcfVzOsA]but”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fdgcfVzOsA). Here we have a nice, light, sweet voice, presented in a context similar to Potts’. I don’t think it is exactly right to compare him to Pavarotti, though.</p>
<p>I am really not sure why the Potts thing is taken off as it has. Its kinda crazy to me to see this William Hung effect transfer to an operatic tenor. I also don’t like the Top Forty treatment of these arias. Puccini’s stuff is so rich. I’d love for people to get it all. Oh well…</p>