It's over.

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
21

<p>Whoa whoa whoa, they’ve decided it’s not rich history anymore?</p>

<p>What was the reasoning behind that - and by that I mean to say a compelling reason, corroborated by evidence. Rolling marbles in her mouth may be sensory, but the entire thing was relating back to the history of words and her appreciation for that history, right?</p>

<p>Otherwise, that’s the first CR I missed! Fuuuuuuuuuu</p>

<p>(not to be cocky bragging about missing one, but the amount of missed questions follows as: how many I know I missed - 3. Usually turns out that way)</p>

22

<p>Jshapiro105, most of the posts aren’t directed towards you.</p>

<p>And larmonely, someone found the book online. The paragraph that the question asked about is definitely about sensory details.</p>

23

<p>Yeah the question referred to that specific paragraph.</p>

24

<p>^ Misconception much? ■■■■■</p>

25

<p>yeah what he said</p>

26

<p>I put moistened but I really start to think that the right choice is ’ consume '…</p>

27

<p>I put consumed first but then realized that had the lushness was a comparison against the barren field and so it has to be positive word, and so then I changed to moisten, which makes a lot more sence than consumed in the first place. Quite honestly, I’m not budged by any of the arguements so far.</p>