AP chem: https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/pdf/ap-chemistry-frq-2017.pdf
A Dartmouth midterm: https://www.dartmouth.edu/~genchem/1718/spring/6winn/pdfs/Exam2Sol.pdf
I’d rather just go back in time and take the AP again to be honest.
AP biology: https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/pdf/ap-biology-frq-2017.pdf
Admittedly, many elites still struggle to get professors to do more concept/experiment focused intro. biology courses (so their rendition may be AP content plus some more and have an emphasis on just tiny details. Style of AP may technically be better, but honestly usually content does not overlap well with even those elites which have a far heavier focus on chemical concepts as well as deeper genetics), but most schools above 12 or so do, so I will use Harvard Life Sciences 1a and Columbia’s :
Harvard:http://people.fas.harvard.edu/~lsci1a/F06final01.pdf
https://courseworks2.columbia.edu/courses/39163/pages/exams
Okay, I’ll throw in MIT:
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/biology/7-013-introductory-biology-spring-2013/exams/MIT7_013S13_Final_SP09Q.pdf
Once again, I will take an AP exam: AP exam also seems to have some memorization focused softballs (like describe gel ) and some “read the data and tell me the trend without an explanation” softballs as well. All 3 of these seem to assume that you can learn chemical concepts well and likely already have exposure to the stuff at the level of AP OR are just straight up reteaching students how to think conceptually and experimentally in biology in addition to a lot more content. But they have the molecular biology/genetics focus I mention and don’t even bother with ecology. Knowing real chemistry is really advantageous.
A big “ouch” especially at Harvard and MIT if you have a poorer chemistry background and poor study habits. Columbia’s is brutal in its own way and they were a place that led a broader movement to cover more advanced experimental concepts in context of “introductory” material in biology. Again, even with elites outside of this tier, it is sort of a different ballgame content wise and style. The second semester of biology at my alma mater is experimentally focused classical and molecular genetics (they try to keep up with the times by focusing upon DNA technology and even things like basic RNAi and CRISPR). It is pretty much a watered down version of what MIT does and in fact, it appears that the problem sets (shamefully many schools, including some elites are still so far removed from a problem based rendition of intro. biology, that they don’t even have p-sets, so even if my version was watered down versus a high bar like H or M, I appreciate the effort) we had may have been partly stolen or “inspired” by theirs. One can only get AP credit for the first semester (which is sort of a slightly enhanced version of the usual cell biology/metabolism course taught at other selective schools. They get into cancer genetics too)