“I would not trust people to determine what treatments were medically necessary, if they or their employers had financial incentives to decline to cover a treatment.”
Yet in this case we trust a mother that has clear financial incentives to maintain that the body is alive, who claims an unspecified “religious belief” that isn’t held by the actual religion the family lists, who has no medical training to make the determination of what is medically necessary even when that is in direct opposition to an actual law and the consensus of the medical community?