<p>
</p>
<p>It was my mistake that I did not scroll down far enough to see the first “verified” review. You’re right Mike; I didn’t count correctly, and I can’t either. But what’s up with the ad hominems? I understand that your primary goal is to move your books, but diplomatic entreaties filled with snide jeers such as the outburst two posts above does make one wonder whether your book is worthy of merit, able to stand robustly by itself, or anemic, requiring much protection from any slights, perceived or otherwise. </p>
<p>Anyway, my meta-analysis isn’t useful. I can’t even formulate the correct ratio of verified to unverified reviewers. I guess I should stop analyzing other peoples’ reviews and start reviewing your book myself, Mike - from my pedestal of authority ;).</p>