<p>nah spenncy, The quote was all about science getting federal funds</p>
<p>What are you smoking? The focus wasn’t on funds, the focus was on the scientists not meeting their goals and underestimating their accountability. The answer choice was like scientist have not been able to meet the expectations, which is why they were held accountable!</p>
<p>thats interesting. i took it to be more like society blindly accepted everything scientists say…and the implicit thing in that is that they had elevated status? and of course scientists have been able to meet societys expectations…since society believes in everything they say. </p>
<p>oops sorry Jan SAT didnt read your post…but what you said.</p>
<p>yes! ^^^</p>
<p>Exactly as van sant said.</p>
<p>and most importantly the answer choice said society’s expecations. IT NEVER EVER EVER EVER said society was upset with science (not in the quote either) all it said was they they dogmaticcaly obliged</p>
<p>does anybody remember the sentence completion where the answer was arduous</p>
<p>What was the question about the “the effect of the question is”? More importantly, what were the choices?</p>
<p>was that in the sea nomads question? i said past/ future, but theres some debate over this</p>
<p>Was that the one that also had the choice of “leads into a discussion about diversity”? Or are we mixing passages/questions here?</p>
<p>Can somebody please tell me if they remember the sentence completion with arduous as the answer</p>
<p>no thats right arachnotron. i was deciding between that option and past/ future. in the end, i went with the most literal and looked at the tenses of each passage, haha.</p>
<p>btw, around how many -'s can one get for an 800? like, -1. -2…</p>
<p>I think this CR curve is going to be super lenient. Like October 2007 lenient, which was:</p>
<p>67 800
66 800
65 800
64 800
63 790
62 770</p>
<p>it was past/future cuz the 1st paragraph was about the nomads in the past… and the second paragraph transistioned and extrapolated about what would happen if the nomads were gone… than later later on it began tlkn about diversity (like last paragraph) but the question asked about the 1st sentence in the 2nd paragrpah</p>
<p>So it was elevated status and not failure to solve society’s problems? Dangit.</p>
<p>And it was cautious over illogical? Double dangit.</p>
<p>And complex/simple over approve/disapprove? I am on a roll of FAIL, wow. Plus I already missed the auspicious one.</p>
<p>Hopefully the curve is super lenient!</p>
<p>it was approve/dissaprove NOT complex/simple… that was an easy one</p>
<p>Did anyone have the passage bout the artist who recreates artworks. If so what was the answer bout the mona lisa wearing a watch. I put anachronism</p>
<p>^ that is the right answer, anachronism is correct!</p>
<p>xs0itg0esx, that one was complex/simple.</p>