<p>^ I said it was because America was built from revolution or something like that.</p>
<p>i also put set the tone for the rest of the passage about diversity blah blah. that was the whole point! and that is usually what the introductory paragraph does, right?</p>
<p>Diversity was 100% not the answer. Not enough support. </p>
<p>Past/Future was found, I thought the answer was too basic but none of the others fit.</p>
<p>^^^^ yes ?mark… and (B) was deff right with “signifigant”</p>
<p>I don’t really remember for the “significant” one. Does anyone remember any other choices?</p>
<p>dissapearance of nomads would be signifigant or something like that</p>
<p>No, it was diversity because it set the tone for later discussion about diversity. I mean, the whole point of the passage was that we, as a race, are headed toward an unfavorable uniformity and that diversity is better for a number of reasons (genetically and such, which WAS mentioned). </p>
<p>So, it was diversity.</p>
<p>xs0itg0esx - i think i put that.</p>
<p>i think it was diversity…it set the tone…to talk about diversity…dur</p>
<p>i don’t think the demographics answer was correct. I think that choice was a trap.</p>
<p>the other plausible answer was passage 1 had a broader social context while passage 2 talked about the implications of rock and roll…</p>
<p>and i’m positive that choice was in the “demographics question”</p>
<p>Sentence one of passage two does not mention diversity at all. Get over it</p>
<p>what was the demographic question?</p>
<p>The diversity one wasn’t a dual passage…</p>
<p>i meant to say paragraph… cuz that question asked about the 1st sentence of the second paragrph; which transitioned from the 1st paragaph (about the pass) to the second paragraph (tlkn bout future possibilities)</p>
<p>TO ALL THOSE WHO PUT DIVERSITY AS AN ANSWER: the question was specifically asking about the 1st sentence of pragraph two… the 1st paragraph spent the whole time tlkn bout the past life of nomads… then in paragraph two, it transitioned to what can possibly happen in the future… so right there we got a supported answer. diversity is wrong becaus it was not mentioned untill later in the passage and had now relevence to sentence one of paragraph two</p>
<p>I marked “past to future” but later changed my answer to diversity.</p>
<p>the 2nd paragraph was a discussion of the possible (negative) effects of homogeneity. the first paragraph was less of a discussion of the past life of nomads as a description of their different, disappearning lifestyle. i really don’t know how to tell you that the sentence in question was about diversity without the sentence itself, except to say that the entire point of the passage was a warning against homogeneity and for diversity, and that the first sentence of paragraph 2 set that up…consensus here, i think, is generally that it was diversity.</p>
<p>i don’t think the demographics answer was correct. I think that choice was a trap.</p>
<p>the other plausible answer was passage 1 had a broader social context while passage 2 talked about the implications of rock and roll…</p>
<p>The Question: Like…what was the difference bet. passage 1 and passage 2. rock and roll passage</p>
<p>The answer didn’t say diversity has to be IN those two sentences. It said “LATER discussion”</p>
<p>@ JP, I definitely put BOTH social context/implication and demographics. Two different questions!</p>