January 2010 Math thread

<p>aw *****. im an idiot.</p>

<p>does someone want to answer my question above?</p>

<p>@jhwu928
Thank you!</p>

<p>im new to this site…and the only one that i got wrong in the math section is the 42 isoceles triangle one. Is there any chance for an 800? anyone have the scale conversion for this test? how much will my score go down wiht one wrong in math? thanks!</p>

<p>I’m probably not going to get above 670 because of the stupid curve. Oh well. At least the other sections aren’t stupid.</p>

<p>yo duches someone better answer my questions and stop ignoring it by other questions</p>

<p>wait in the quadrilateral problem how did you know that one of the sides was 12?</p>

<p>I vaguely remember getting 10/9 or 1.11 for my penultimate or last grid-in. Can anyone confirm this?</p>

<p>@caizzacuz- that was definitely experimental</p>

<p>@doughboy- I remember one of them being 1/9?</p>

<p>can any of u guys post the scale curve for this SAT??</p>

<p>and cud someone answer my other ?s</p>

<p>I am almost 100% sure I got an 800
however that knitting question was weird, I really didnt understand the wording of that one
What was the answer does anyone remember?</p>

<p>shaq sucks, but whatever what were your questions</p>

<p>@caizzacuz17 thanks ur awesome.</p>

<p>Is there any chance for an 800? anyone have the curve for this test? how much will my score go down wiht one wrong in math?</p>

<p>It was isoscleles, so the legs had to be equal, and the legs had to add up to more than 20, so they both had to be 11. (Integers.) If it was 41, then you’d have 10 and 11, which is not isoscleles.</p>

<p>shaq one wrong will prob be like a 780 in mc, 790 in grid in</p>

<p>it was the isoceles prob, so 780? any chance for a 790 maybe?</p>

<p>prob a 780</p>

<p>do u hav the scale curve? or maybe a gneral curve for an SAT like this</p>