<p>and the passage specifically said he is not against the practice. Thus, it has to be between the two: guarded skpetism.</p>
<p>Yup. Guarded skepticism.</p>
<p>did anyone put “rice is centrality to meals” for the japanese one?</p>
<p>I put outright condemnation because skepticism implies he’s not against it.</p>
<p>skeptism menas he’s not against it. that is why it is the answer… It SAYS he isn’t against it.</p>
<p>I put importnat to family or sth like that, not the meal.</p>
<p>Have we figured out which passages were in the experimental reading? Hopefully the acting passage was. I put guarded skepticism, but I think it’s wrong. </p>
<p>I’m pretty sure section 5 was the experimental reading, but I just dont remember the passages that went with it. Any help would be appreciated.</p>
<p>EDIT: And does anyone remember the exact wording of the 10^5 / 10^-3 one? Was a<b or was b<a?</p>
<p>The experimental CR passage was about how being in a group affects the opinions of individuals. The acting wasn’t experimental.</p>
<p>It was the groups and opinions one</p>
<p>The passage with architecture. the second question I believe had a quote about something “we have … false allusions.” what was the answer to that?</p>
<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>Could someone please remind me of the question (as much as you can remember!) for the one which everyone says the answer is disclosure? It’s part of the seahorse passage.</p>
<p>In regards to the outright condemnation vs. guarded skepticism, I put the former because condemnation by definition, regardless of connotation, means criticism. To get the right answer, we need to consider both words: remember, for the SAT, one keyword makes the whole answer incorrect.</p>
<p>Outspoken - Frank in stating one’s opinions, esp. if they are critical or controversial
This checks out, and as stated before, condemnation checks out.</p>
<p>Guarded - Cautious and having possible reservations.
This does not check out, making the whole answer incorrect. </p>
<p>One other controversial question was the “not wholly autonomous” vs. “unrealistically ambitious.” If you use the rule that says you read the line and down to the end of the paragraph, the answer appears to be “unrealistically ambitious.” If you read the passage as a whole, the answer seems to be “not wholly autonomous.”</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>I don’t remember a groups and opinions CR.</p>
<p>Can you describe some other parts in there?</p>
<p>There was one about a mosaic and a DJ or something, which one was that?</p>
<p>Did anyone have a CR passage about an African American girl and her piano teacher? I can’t be the only one, can I? O.o</p>
<p>@jugu @z0 I think u guys got experimental cuz i dun remember doing that</p>
<p>Or, what section is the experimental? section 4 or 5?</p>
<p>the number doesn’t matter… it’s all mixed up for everyone.</p>
<p>The groups/opinions passage was experimental, so that’s why you didn’t have it.</p>
<p>I haven’t heard of anyone having an African American girl passage…</p>
<p>It was like with a teacher… Miss Mazzy? Or something like that. It was kinda weird. How the teacher and her played Bach, and they became really close. o.o</p>
<p>i told u thats an experimental</p>
<p>But there should at least be someone else that has it with me, shouldn’t there? I’ve gone through 50+ pages of this forum, and I can’t find anyone else…</p>
<p>@desperados what was the the autonomous one in? the passage about architecture?</p>
<p>did you guys have the adopter and resister one for improving paragraphs?</p>