<p>@horusb231: @AZKoogle: I heard people choose justification rather than disclosure.</p>
<p>Could that be right, considering that she justifies her excitement in seeing a seahorse like seeing a unicorn in your yard?</p>
<p>i put eagerness</p>
<p>she wasn’t completely sure that the reasons she gave were why she was so spellbound (which was the answer to one of the questions, right?) with seahorses. she said that it was perhaps for those reasons.</p>
<p>i put disclosure. Justification, I believe, is weird in a sense that the main point of the passage is not to justify his finding or excitement of sea-horse.</p>
<p>im pretty sure it was disclosure. b/c shes not justifying anything, shes just disclosing this info about what it really feels like to see a seahorse. and it was spellbound</p>
<p>Can someone confirm if the experimental reading included fill in the blank answer choices such as iconoclast, insidious, execrable, and auspicious (I think)? </p>
<p>Are we positive that if one test form did not feature a certain section, then it is definitely experimental?</p>
<p>it was eagerness. it says she expected to see one that day or something. and she even asks the question Pehaps I’ll see one today? or something. so it wasn’t cheerfulness or determination. if she was determined she wouldn’t have asked that question “perhaps…?” and it would sound more like “I will find this seahorse today.” and its not cheerfulness, b/c theres nothing in that party that really supports her being cheerful. she anticipating this sea horse sighting, which WOULD make her happy, but she hasn’t seen it yet. she’s eager to, anticipating it, which is why the answer is eagerness</p>
<p>@rvirginia i remember execrable, but not in an experimental section. and are you sure it wasnt audacious? and yes. if a test without an extra reading cr, then we know any other cr sections that didnt match up with those were experimental</p>
<p>No, I remember audacious in one of my earlier sections, then auspicious was in my fifth section (along with execrable, iconoclastic, and insidious). Did you have experimental reading?</p>
<p>@glasses1: perhaps she’s justifying her excitement?</p>
<p>i dont remember even what i put, but justification in this context seems like the more appropriate answer.
By comparing the unicorns in a yard to her seeing a seahorse, she justifies how exciting it might have been for her</p>
<p>@rvirginia. no experimental reading, but i do remember execrable in a different section, maybe it was a choice but i didnt put it as an asnwer</p>
<p>@desperados its hard to argue these things when neither of us can concretely recall what the answers were exactly or what specifically they were referring to… so we’ll just let it go…</p>
<p>unless someone else can help one side or the other</p>
<p>was audacious an answer to a question? can someone remind me</p>
<p>it was a choice, but i dont think it was an answer</p>
<p>Do all tests have at least 1 dual long reading passage?</p>
<p>I couldn’t finish my essay… The instructor only told us when we had 5 minutes left and I couldn’t write a conclusion because I was still finishing my first example/starting the second, I didn’t finish the second example and couldn’t even finish the phrase with a meaning.</p>
<p>How will that affect my Essay score? Can I hope for a 4 at least? I wrote 1 page and 5 lines, probably. My first example was well-developed.</p>
<p>First time taking the SATs, International Student taking the SATs in the USA.</p>
<p>anyone get rejuvenated as an answer to a fill in?.. if not, what did you get and do you remember the question?</p>
<p>it was rejuvenated. it was about the doctor being rejuvenated by increased arduous work, not tired out by it</p>
<p>@bhchamp ooh i was wondering about that too</p>
<p>Do you guys remember the question with egregious as an answer choice? What was the answer?</p>