<p>@mizejonathan17
One question for you if you don’t mind. Did you have a math grid in section containing a question which had ticket prices for children, adults, and students to some sort of event? It was something like $8.50 for children, $10 for students, and $15 for adults. It gave you information about how much the group paid and some fractions to determine how many people were in each section (student, child, adult). I’m somewhat sure this section was experimental but I’d like some more reassurance.</p>
<p>@lcmcb1 It may have had another question that gave you two half triangles that when combined gave you a rectangle. For that question, they asked you to find the area. </p>
<p>@iconicsoul
I definitely had the question about combining the two triangles. I’m not sure what I got for the f(x) f(c) thing though. Any other info from the question that might help?</p>
<p>@alorsalors: No, that was not experimental. I had a CR experimental but I still had that math section.</p>
<p>@mizejonathan17: I really don’t think that’s right. It was indeed an unequivocal, or unambiguous, statement in favor of fluoride. It touted its beneficial effects and attempted to put to rest worries expressed by various naysayers.</p>
<p>It could not at all be considered a “legal position”. A legal position would be one characterized by legalese, references to court case precedents, references to laws and statutes, jurisprudence terms, and perhaps citations from legal experts. Just because the person in the passage endorsing fluoride was a figure of authority, that does not make it a legal position.</p>
<p>I think it’s important for people to recognize that when they are in the minority with these questions, they are most likely wrong.</p>
<p>@lcmcb1 I vaguely remember that question. I think that one was experimental… Then again, I could be wrong. It sounds familiar to me, and I had an experimental math section.
@ckoepp127 I see where you’re coming from. I can see how “legal position” is wrong. I made the improper assumption that just because an “official source” was making a statement, it was directly related to political affair. Yeah, that’s a good point. Especially since the people who care enough to post answers on these forums are usually high-achieving students. </p>
<p>@mizejonathan17
I also believe that I had an experimental math section. Do you remember any questions from your experimental section? Another question from the section that I think may be experimental was a grid in question about a 4 sided shape in a circle. It gave two angle measures as 20 degrees and wanted the angle measure for x.</p>
<p>I actually do remember that one. I’ll try to remember other one’s, but I’m blank at the moment.</p>
<p>@mizejonathan17
If you could come up with any of the questions on the experimental math section you had that would be very helpful. If I also had one of those questions on the same section then it’s pretty much guaranteed that this section was experimental. Ckoepp127 didn’t remember having either of the questions that I just asked you about so I’m almost positive that this was the section that was experimental.</p>
<p>mizejonathan17: well if it makes you feel any better some guy who claims to work w/ collegeboard just said the answer is legal position…that being said, it’s probably (I hope) just some kid trying to tell us what he thinks are the answers. Anytime anyone asks him for proof that he is who he says he is, he just avoids the question.</p>
<p>@ckoepp127
Yeah, that doesn’t sound legitimate at all. Why would a guy who works with the college board be on forums telling people answers to questions on the test? Doesn’t sound like he’s telling the truth.</p>
<p>I don’t know, I’m trying to mess with him right now.</p>
<p>ckoepp127: Yeah… that’s dubious for sure. I would agree that he’s just some kid who put what I put, and is trying to justify his wrong (most likely) answer. With that being said, I sure hope he’s not joking!<br>
lcmcb1: I honestly don’t remember any more q’s off the experimental section. If one does come to me sometime in the near future, I’ll let you know.</p>
<p>What do you guys think the curve will be for -3 CR (0 Omitted) and -1 W w/9-10 on essay?</p>
<p>For CR, I’d say a solid 760. For Writing, a probable 770 or 780.</p>
<p>-3 CR is probably like 770ish, -1 W with a 10 on the essay is probably a 780 or 790 MAYBE an 800, -1 with a 11 is almost certainly an 800.</p>
<p>Do you think that the CR curve will be fairly harsh? It seems to be like it will be average/harsh end of average. I’d say the writing curve will be somewhat generous, considering the idioms/difficult to spot errors that normally don’t show up as frequently.</p>
<p>@mizejonathan17
I just thought of another question that I’m fairly sure was on the section that I’m thinking was experimental. It was a question with two equations. One of the equations was “something = ax + a number” and the other was “something = a number times x + a number.” Just to throw in random numbers it might have been y = ax + 4 and y = 4x + 7. It said that a was a constant and asked some question about the two equations. Sorry I can’t remember more of it. Does this sound familiar to you at all?</p>
<p>Well CR is always pretty generous compared to the other sections. I can pretty much guarantee that with 2 wrong you’ll still get an 800. Now, compared with other CR curves, I think it will actually be slightly more generous. I thought it was actually kind of tricky, and there has been a lot of heated dissent about tons of problems.</p>
<p>I HOPE the W curve is generous. I got one stupid question wrong and I really don’t want that to screw me over. </p>
<p>Does anyone know if it’s possible to get two sections of math with grid in responses without one of them being experimental?</p>
<p>Based on what I’ve seen, I think this is how I did:</p>
<p>M: 0
CR: -5
W: -3, assume 10 on essay</p>
<p>Any guesses on my subsection scores? If I had to guess, it’'d be 800, 730, 740 or something similar.</p>