***January 2014 SAT (US ONLY)***

<p>Yeah that money adds up. I have applied to 7 schools that were not free to apply; some superscore individual tests, some superscore SAT/ACT, some don’t superscore. You can only send four SATs for free. I took the ACT and my second SAT before I knew any of the schools I was applying to.</p>

<p>This mess results in me having to pay boatloads out of pocket to send these tests to the schools that need them.</p>

<p>I’m almost mad at how well the January test went for me. I feel like I did way better than last time. Now I feel obligated to send this score to all my schools… ugh.</p>

<p>Do I have to pay for each SAT score to be sent over two/three dates, or will all my past scores be sent together for $11?</p>

<p>You four free score reports include every test you’ve taken through collegeboard, including SAT II. When you pay the extra $11, all of your scores are sent, SAT I and II. </p>

<p>So yes, it always sends all your scores, unless you indicate otherwise.</p>

<p>Thank you :slight_smile: </p>

<p>Can you guys please put this reflections question to rest? I’ve heard 1, 2, and 3. Everyone who told me these answers (in real life and online) seems to be confident in their reasoning and is fairly intelligent (at least I can attest to that for the real life part)</p>

<p>It’s 3.</p>

<p>It’s 3.</p>

<p>ckoepp127 is literally a wizard. You can trust him on this one.</p>

<p>thank god </p>

<p>No, thank ckoepp127. Wizard > god</p>

<p>lol I’m pretty sure ckoepp127 is a wizard and better than you. I’ve known him for really long and you’re not as smart. He could beat you at anything. omg</p>

<p>Well you seem like a dick no offense dude.</p>

<p>Also you seem really stupid. There’s no point in taking the SAT again with a 2400 and 11 essay, for obvious reasons that I won’t mention unless you realllllly have no idea.</p>

<p>That’s alright though because I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re lying :stuck_out_tongue: And FWIW, yea I’ve gotten multiple 2400s on practice SATs from years prior. So sorry, but you’re not that special kid.</p>

<p>Ooh looks like you got two wrong that were obvious to everyone else too, the fruition one and the critic one. Tough luck champ.</p>

<p>omg the wizard poasted</p>

<p>You’re damn right. Dr. Phil is in the house.</p>

<p>

You nailed him.</p>

<p>I know. That’s what happens when you have to deal with a li’l bi tch like heleuitr1.</p>

<p>(I’m just playing heleuitr1. But seriously, you totally did come off as a total kunt in your posts :slight_smile: )</p>

<p>that feel when it appears this guy’s posts got removed.</p>

<p>Didn’t the question ask for common points when the line/graph was reflected? The only one that would be the same is the point that was in the very middle. SO it’s just 1</p>

<p>No, there were three points of intersection, therefore 3 common points. </p>

<p>It asked for common points. They would only be intersections if there were more than 1 line, no?</p>