<p>kkmama-</p>
<p>So what you are saying is because of McQueary’s lack of action (which I do question), then Joe P is off the hook? But given what McQ told Paterno, even if his version is true that McQ told him simply ‘something happened that may have involved sex’ (which I have to be honest, I find incredible, I can’t think of any reason why McQ wouldn’t tell Paterno what he saw), the fact that it involved someone with a child make it a crime, whether it was ‘inappropriate contact’ as Paterno said he though, or rape, it is still a horrible thing, it doesn’t change the fact of what Paterno did.</p>
<p>Without defending McQ, do you even know what the culture at Penn St was like? The fact that the AD, Schwartz and the president decided to cover this up (apparently the only penalty was banning Sandusky from the campus, which apparently never went so far as to actually enforce it) tells you that like the church, the culture was to not spill the dirty laundry, even when it involved children. Again, without defending him, McQ had an excuse in that someone who is a graduate assistant is like an intern in a company, they are nobody, and had he reported it to the police he likely not only would have been fired, he would have been effectively blackballed…Paterno, meanwhile, had no such fear, if the school tried to retaliate against him for reporting suspected child abuse, he could bring so much heat on them forget it…politicians, cops, lawyers, big donors, you name it. </p>
<p>And the excuse that he was a ‘busy man’ tells a lot of tales about the issue here, that somehow Paterno’s role as football coach put him ‘above everything’…which is quite ironic considering the fact that he himself preached, time and again, the need for integrity and putting what is important in front of football, things like ethics, learning and family. Figures like Paterno cannot get away with the old ‘do as I say, not as I do’, the church learned that one (well, I don’t think they did, but that is another thread).</p>
<p>As far as letting Joe stay to coach, there were real reasons to do what they did. To prevent something like this happening again, they needed to send a message to everyone at the school that no one, not the head of the school, not St. Joe Paterno, was above doing the right thing, that there is accountability at the school. I think a lot more people are going to be fired, I don’t think they are finished yet, they are still investigating, but in this case, they have a clear case where someone in high authority at the school deliberately passed the ball and didn’t do what he was supposed to; hopefully others will get it. Why is this important? You need only to look at the church, where despite changes in rules and such, Biishops still feel free to duck the law (like, for example, the recently retired bishop in Philadelphia)…there was no accountability, the bishops who orchestrated the policy of protecting pedophile priests overwhelmingly faced no consequences, and as with the Philadelphia Bishop, still don’t…and they know that.</p>
<p>Plus, think about this, if Paterno had been allowed to stay and then ‘retire’, it is sending the signal that ‘okay, you screw up, we’ll cover for you’. Not to mention, can you imagine what it would be like if Joe was on the sideline? You would have people protesting outside the stadium and within it, you would have had the kind of people who rioted last night trying to assault those on the other side, it would be a war zone, it would have distracted from the game itself and would have made it much, much worse. </p>
<p>And before claiming they acted meanly, think about what happens in the business world when scandals happen, people are fired for a lot less then that, employees writing negative posts on facebook can and have been fired for behavior detrimental to the company, why should Joe P as an employee of the university be any different? The board of trustees are responsible for the university and had the duty in this case to try and protect it.</p>