How does the grad school placement affect these “outcome based” surveys - where kids are still in school and not working/earning after college? Are schools that send a high proportion of students on to med/law school disadvantaged in these rankings as a result? Sorry if this is obvious to some - the fine print and ranking methodology detail makes my eyes bleed.
4 Likes
Excellent question that many tend not to pay attention to. Its discussed in more depth here Problems and limitations with College career outcome reports: reading between the lines
I stopped reading this poll at #2. I have a ton of respect for Babson but it isn’t the #2 school in the country in my book.
2 Likes
In reality, Babson should be in a b school ranking, not an overall university rank.
you said the same exact thing last year. surprised given your expertise in college search and selection that WSJ is not listening closer to your thought-leadership.
2 Likes
Someone upthread figured out that the WSJ “ranking” is AI generated!!! So maybe @happy1 is glad that BigBrother isn’t listening to her!! 
2 Likes
I, personally, like to see them compete on the big stage. For so many years they have been the #1 business specialty school and #1 school for entrepreneurship with USN. I always felt they deserve more than that becasue those categories receive little focus. Who would have thought that entrepreneurs pull a strong ROI?
2 Likes
I get it - I guess the point is comparing business vs. sociology - but I do agree then, they are a top school - at least by the methodology use.
When people say they don’t believe in this ranking - well is there any ranking they will?
I remember a year or two ago - UF was high in every ranking it seemed - and I started to think - well, they must be doing something right!! Everyone loves them!!
1 Like
At least I’m consistent LOL. Same time next year?
8 Likes
Eliciting an amused chortle from your friend Indysceptic.
1 Like
Maybe WSJ will come to their senses and fix the data like other rankings or just exclude Babson to help people see the same familiar faces!?
1 Like
I am a proponent of looking up criteria that is important to a particular student in publications like CDS/IPEDS, College Scorecard, or the college websites. Colleges can be ranked according to the particular criteria the student values, if the student chooses to do so.
Magazines/websites creating a formula to rank colleges that applies arbitrarily selected weightings to a bunch of stats is fundamentally flawed. Some rankings are more/less flawed than others, but the output of that formula is unlikely to produce a meaningful way for particular students to rank or select colleges.
For example, suppose a particular high achieving student comes from a relatively lower income family ($60k income) and hopes to attend college without debt. The student plans to major in biomedical engineering followed by medical school. The student prioritizes a college that would assist with her medical school goal. The student values personal attention and smaller class sizes. I doubt that the WSJ ranking will be meaningful for this student, or for nearly all other students. Rather than recommending that the student choose a different magazine/website ranking, I think the better solution is for the student to focus on the criteria that is important to her.
2 Likes
You mean, fix the data in all the rankings?
2 Likes
100% agreed. But people use them as if they’re the Bible. If you’re wealthy, do you care about social mobility ? And is the ROI spending $100k the same as someone getting a full ride ?
People have no idea - they just see top 20.
Department ranks on US News are based on perception. Zero real world behind them.
Oh well. To each their own. But if WAJ, whatever their methodology, says Williams isn’t top 100 - I’m fine maybe they’re not - based on whatever criteria they use.
But here we are.
1 Like
We will have to agree to disagree. As I noted above, I am a fan of Babson – I just don’t see it as close to the #2 college in the country.
Babson is a great school, but it is a specialty school (business).
Wealthy people want to avoid downward social mobility for themselves and their kids. Why else would they deploy money to ensure that their kids have ample opportunities and advantages to build good college admission resumes?
2 Likes
Wonder where Bentey came in. And Rose Hulman.
Someone posted the top 100 - will take a look.
1 Like
The stat is meant for uplifting people though.
If people looked at the ranking or let’s say they put out 20 metrics and said choose what’s important to you and even let you weight them, each person’s would be different and a lot of the top wouldn’t be top - especially those focused on money.
Wealthy people don’t assume going down - whereas the not wealthy see going up.
And it is true, schools like Williams are generous - but I assure you, people aren’t saying, let me send my wealthy kid with a maid , private tutors and club sports…so they can hang with the less fortunate.
1 Like