<p>Speaking of lack of attention to detail, it seems like OP shares something in common w/ the purveyors of the BLC.</p>
<p>NU and Amherst have higher SAT scores than schools like Cornell, UCB, Georgetown, Hopkins, etc.</p>
<p>I can’t recall when NU’s SAT scores/grades were ever lower than Georgetown’s much less UCB - so it’s not like this is merely outdated info., it’s incorrect info.</p>
<p>I guess it’s no coincidence that UCB is ranked in Tier 1 and that the founder of BLC is UCB grad, or that UCLA (which, btw, also has a ridiculously high SAT score range) is ranked in the 2nd Tier while UMichigan and UVA are ranked in the 3rd tier.</p>
<p>The fact that the SAT score range for Amherst/Williams, NU and WUSTL are the same for the likes of UCLA and BC is ridiculous - or the fact that CMU, Emory and Tufts have a range lower than that of UCLA and BC.</p>
<p>Also, Stanford’s range is lower and should be with the grouping of Penn, NU, UChicago, WUSTL, Duke, etc.</p>
<p>Frankly, based on what I see on the BLC site, I wouldn’t put much credence in what they have to say (that is unless one is a person as gullible as OP).</p>