Confused on the direction of your second point. I asked what your thoughts were regarding my personal scores in comparison to the schools median acceptance scores, emphasis on the word median. Simply put, I was asking whether or not you thought achieving 10points higher. than the median LSAT score can help eclipse a GPA deficit of .25.
You seem to be answering whether or not it would be worth attending a law school that would be willing to accept such (under achieving?) student, which was not the question.
My first step of business is getting in, from there I can show my worth— be within the top 20% of my class. With being top 20% of the class, theoretically, the probability of me being apart of the 65% receiving employment would be exceptionally high… also being apart of the 20% getting into big firms rather possible. OR after getting in and achieving top 20% of the class, attempt to transfer to a higher ranked LS.
Again. Literally 1/4th …25%… of my undergrad GPA is ruined because of me just blowing freshman year. Stupid, Immature, etc. I know. Good thing college did its job and allowed me to grow and develop wants— which I will be putting into my essay, pointing out the rapid turn around and the consistently increasing grade improvement. Increasing GPA while taking courses that are increasing exponentially in difficulty, need I mention.
(i.e. ENG101, Intro to communication, History -> Neurology of Pain, Calc 3, Organic Chemistry) It shows character and the ability to succeed with a rigorous course load.
And I’m also going to have to disagree with your opinion on no difference between Bioscience or Basketweaving for 2 reasons:
- Your poor (missing) explanation of why you don’t believe it to make a difference, displaying your under appreciation for the question hence the under developed response.
- There are admission committee's for a reason. The schools receive your entire course by course transcript for a reason, and they are very sophisticated on there interpretation... rather than receiving strictly just your GPA score and nothing else. Similarly to how the committee will interpret a GPA from your local community college versus ones GPA from Harvard differently. Admission isn't robotic.
So, again, I suppose my question wasn’t/isn’t DO they weigh some majors’ GPAs differently… (bringing all aspects together now)… but rather HOW MUCH (which is obviously rhetorical) but do you think the combination of this slightly lenient GPA review and achieving TEN points higher than the median LSAT score (which are extremely pivotal points as I’m sure you know) would make it POSSIBLE for acceptance even though theres a -.25 differential from the MEDIAN GPA score.
And I didn’t see how me telling you why I wanted to go to LS would’ve helped you answer me question, nor did I think you cared.