<p>
</p>
<p>Right, which is why I mentioned that the money needs to be spent wisely and efficiently. There seems to be no shortage of leakages in funding into less-than-useful projects.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>What’s wrong with having one kid who may not be entirely qualified into the school if generations of students will benefit from it? Look at it as a trade-off: the kid’s parents offers the university and its students more resources and opportunities, and the university offers the kid more resources and opportunities by admitting him/her. Oh wait. I know what’s wrong. Non-legacy students develop a case of bitter-tosis. These students are a very small minority of the population; get over it.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>In terms of school loyalty.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t think anyone claimed that.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>What’s the point in attacking other schools? That doesn’t help the fact that UCs don’t manage their funds as well as they could. At least one school in Cambridge, MA manages its funds well.</p>