UMass Isenberg is excellent. Great college town, great food, and even the opportunity to cross-register for classes at the LAC’s in the consortium. (It’s also a National Student Exchange school, FWIW.)
For the in-state price, this sets an awfully high bar in terms of bang-for-the-buck, quality of education, and quality of life.
UMD, spring start, not-the-business-school, and OOS full-pay-minus-$12K, which is still over 50K/year? What’s keeping this in contention?
Syracuse with 36K merit is still over 56K/year. Whitman+Honors is good - will offer that span of strength in both business and liberal arts that you’re looking for. But the value-added is going to need to be discerned, because UMass is academically comparable, IMO.
Colgate, Lehigh… full-pay, not-business… that’s a lot of money to compromise on what is really desired academically, and I’m not hearing that either one is a slam-dunk for your kid in some other way.
“Going small” does not mean you don’t have to compete. It doesn’t even necessarily mean a more welcoming/nurturing social experience (my kid and many of her small-school peers learned this the hard way). To get the most out of college, you have to take a lot of initiative, no matter where you go. Kids who opt out of large publics, because they think opportunities will come more easily at a smaller school, often learn that it’s just a different flavor of competition. And kids who attend large publics, thinking they’re going to feel like “a number,” are often surprised at the extent to which their efforts are met with willing mentorship and advocacy as long as they do their part.
My sense is that if you took the “familiarity breeds contempt” factor out of the equation here, none of the other choices would provide a clear advantage worth paying for, over UMass. But if you visit and one of the schools wins you over, that’s great, as long as the burden is on them to resonate with your kid to a sufficient extent.