I hear you and understand your points, but we will have to agree to disagree. I don’t think partial data is necessarily meaningful or useful, when I can’t see what’s missing, or for what proportion of applicants/matriculants the included or excluded data represents.
And for the record, DO school is certainly a traditional path to becoming a physician. Why leave that data out (seemingly it’s not included)?
Similarly, why leave the >2 year applicant data out? That could easily be as large as, or even greater than the sample size for the within two year of graduation data they do show.
UCB is purposely selecting a subset of data to show, and excluding potentially significant data. That makes me suspect the data they are choosing to show us, and I am not comfortable drawing conclusions from this incomplete data.