Main Nomination vs Competing Nomination

<p>

I have to go with JAM on this one. About screen #6 of the CGIS, it specifically states that if one has questions, after checking the linked FAQs, to email their regional director. They have the candidate record and they have the answers. Initial BGO training is just sufficient, in most cases, not to be dangerous. Sure they are busy but this is their job. Do as they say. Follow their instructions. Contact them with your questions.</p>

<p>

I would never trust anything from a forum. Parents, alumni, and current mids often have a very limited parochial view which often is not applicable to the extent that they think it is. Use the forum perhaps for ideas but, for anything important, confirm with the Admissions office.</p>

<p>

BGO interviews and teacher recs are a part of the initial triple qual and, therefore, would never be used to revoke it. Getting in trouble of some type or poor grades, in addition to the aforementioned medical issues, could, however, be an issue. Perhaps you were thinking of the very few LOAs which are awarded without full submittals.</p>

<p>

This isn’t the way it works. Candidates are reviewed depending on their competitiveness when their packages become complete, not as a group. When the slate is sumitted and when all the packages have completed review, WPM totals are simply ranked and the candidate with the greatest WPM is awarded the nomination. Nominations for candidates requiring medical waivers, so long as progress is normal, will normally be held until I-Day. Time and tide will wait.</p>