<p>The last question, asking for the shorter diagonal of a parallelogram.
53? anyone? i think it was like C or D</p>
<p>umm i thought the answer to the log question was 2A. did anyone else get that answer?</p>
<p>i got like 4a…i don’t quite remember though.</p>
<p>i cant wait until 5/28!!!</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure it was 4a. because it was (1/2)log(something) to 2log(something) which is 1/2 times 4 is 2. god, that didnt make any sense.</p>
<p>So what really is the answer for the box and whisker plot question? I know it’s already mentioned here previously but I can’t see consensus.
I. 50 percent is greater
II. standard deviation
III. range</p>
<p>(they might be out of order)</p>
<p>i think the standard deviation one is false, because aren’t standard deviations smaller when the range is smaller too?</p>
<p>and don’t scores come out 5/30?</p>
<p>scores come out online 5/24</p>
<p>hmm, that’s what the table said. i think that’s what they planned, but on “my organizer” in the “my to-do” list it says “check back on may 30 for may 5 SAT scores,” so i’m thinking that’s more reliable.</p>
<p>has anyone taken this test before in january (any year) and gotten an 800? if so, what was your score?</p>
<p>a close friend of mine skipped a good few (8-10) on the jan. '06 math lvl 2 test and she got an 800 … she’s definitely not the person to lie about these kind of things, but from reading everything here, her feat seems impossible considering her score.</p>
<p>Hey, when we had to maximize that graph between -2 and 4, was the answer -2? I took the derivative and found that the two local maxima/minima were both possible answers, but then i graphed it and was disappointed to see that -2 was the largest.</p>
<p>so far…i missed 3 for sure…dang…
would score under 700 hurt a chance at ucla or cal???</p>
<p>do you guys think i can get above 700 with 3~4omits and about 5miss??</p>
<p>if its really 3~4omits and 5 miss, its over 700.</p>
<p>Dolcevalse, did your friend really skip 8? AND GET AN 800? There is hope!!! AAH. </p>
<p>Though it is extremely unlikely that -8 raw = 800 this time. Was January extremely difficult or something?</p>
<p>
if it helps, i have a friend who scored low 700s (sometimes high 600s i think) on barrons p-tests and he got an 800 on the real thing.</p>
<p>aquamarinee, she really DID get an 800. and after i told her about people here at CC who think that getting a raw of 43 is EXTREMELY LUCKY (to get an 800), she didn’t believe me … i don’t know how difficult the jan '06 test was.</p>