<p>Didn’t get that one about brody, so it was experimental. Even if you got it wrong, it won’t count against you. </p>
<p>hehehe…brody.</p>
<p>can someone PLEASE look through previous pages about the “exemplify previous statement” question? It’s such a huge debate and we were definitely discussing the different answers besides exemplify earlier in this thread. I’m pretty sure we dedicated 2 pages to that question. If you do you’re a huge lifesaver!!</p>
<p>if someone does look it up, it was in the first half of this thread. That’s all i remember (ps I didn’t choose exemplify. I chose a better answer than that).</p>
<p>Does anybody remember the tables question? What was the answer?</p>
<p>@ivykid96 it was 120.</p>
<p>18 6 seater tables gives you 9 * 6 and 18 4 seaters gives you 18 * 4= 126, how’d you get 120?</p>
<p>i also did it the same as you @ivykid but the majority of the ppl in here said it was 120. Too tired to explain how they got it but if you look at the recent previous pages you’ll definitely find an explanation since that question was explained repeatedly</p>
<p>@ivykid In order to make a 6 seater table you have to put 2 regular 4 seater tables together. There are 36 tables that would normally sit 4 people in total, so you can’t do 18 and 18 because that would only leave 9 tables that seat 6 people since you put 2 together to seat 6. So, you have to divide it into 12 4 seater tables and 24 that will be used as 6 seater tables.</p>
<p>Put the 24 together into 6 seater tables and you get 12 6 seaters and 12 4 seaters, and the question said the number of 4 and 6 seater configurations are the same. 12(4) + 12(6) = 48 + 72 = 120.</p>
<p>Wait the passage about darwin for cr was a experimental right?</p>
<p>Does anyone think we got lucky or are the SAT tests always like this?</p>
<p>For example, the math was actually pretty easy - not too many questions were difficult.</p>
<p>The reading passages were actually interesting - aren’t they sometimes really, really (and I mean REALLY) boring and unbearable?</p>
<p>The essay prompt wasn’t too hard either.</p>
<p>Is the SAT always the same difficulty level?</p>
<p>This is a rough rememberance of what my intro/thesis to my essay was:</p>
<p>The presupposition that you need to be happy to be wise is a categorical false. Due to circumstances and conditions beyond the control of the individual, one cannot always be happy while being wise. Historical figures and archetypes that support this notion are Malcolm X, Hannibal Barca, and The Odyssey.</p>
<p>@mash101 i agree. i came out of the march sitting thinking i failed, it was pretty tough but somehow it came out to a 2210 so i guess everyone struggled with it too. came out of the may sitting thinking i did well, it wasn’t hard at all (except a math section that i’ve determined experimental.) lets hope i do well this time!</p>
<p>sidenote: any reading section is more interesting than one solely devoted to corn. thanks, april ACT.</p>
<p>EXEMPLIFY PREVIOUS STATEMENT= thanks to someone on the google doc, they listed the other choice that’s the right answer. It was to challenge widespread beliefs. Hope this finally ends this debate.</p>
<p>wait guys in CR was one of the answers used or formulate? i put used</p>
<p>I put used as well</p>
<p>Wait was the exemplify question in the deception passage? Did it refer to the thing about little kids being taught lying is bad in passage 1? I can’t seem to remember</p>
<p>What did you guys get for the arc degree question?</p>
<p>@meredithwalsh i put used too, formulate wouldn’t work there because invoke has nothing to do with formulating things. in that context, invoking something most closely resembles used.</p>
<p>yeah the exemplify question was about to the little kids</p>
<p>Wait did the question ask about like why the author used quotations? Or was it like why did he refer to the examples</p>
<p>Oh wait I think it asked why the author included those rhetorical questions after the statement about how children are taught that lying is bad. I chose exemplify because although the passage overall contrasted the statement, those particular questions were used to exemplify the statement. Not sure though</p>
<p>Does anyone remember a question where one of the answer choices was:
“180-(x/2-y/2)”</p>
<p>It was trying to find an angle in terms of x and y, and it had like 2 equilaterial triangles on either side of a triangle that had two equal sides, and below that triangle was another shape (i forget what shape).</p>
<p>Anyone recall?</p>