McCain: A 'disturbing' observation

<p>I’ll take short term memory loss over intentionally deceiving who I REALLY AM any day of the week. Core principles are important, something Obama lacks. Unfortunately for him it will be his downfall. It’s an undefendable position even for his most fervent supporters.The more scrutiny he undergoes the more the facade begins to crumble!</p>

<p>If someone has memory loss and won’t admit it, then who is doing the deceiving? The problem with memory loss is that, at that age, at best it can be stabilized. If it involves any sort of pathological dementia it will progress over eight years. Of course, there are drugs in the pipeline to address dementia disorders, but who knows when they’ll find the one that really works. Will it be in the next eight years?</p>

<p>Well if McCain comes to Baltimore and says he gave the names of the Baltimore Ravens, we’ll know there’s a real problem.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>A man’s energy and mind crumbling are more likely to disturb voters deeply than a putative facade crumbling.</p>

<p>The word being spread on Obama is that he’s getting more moderate after being more leftist. Whether or not one agrees with this interpretation, I find it funny that someone manifestly on the right would criticize someone for supposedly coming closer to the right. Yes, yes, I know – such criticisms are aimed at showing there is no there there with Obama, but the reality is that this is much more the case with McCain, and Republicans are really nervous about it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>mini - I think you’ve reached a new “low” in your posts! Not only is what you said the quintessential negative attack, but it is also blatantly FALSE!</p>

<p>There is much more to McCain than his “memory” and his experiences as a POW. How about the fact that he has been a tireless fighter against governemt waste, fraud & abuse, NEVER voting for a tax increase or pork projects for his state. How about his experiences on the various Congressional/Senate committees over 20+ years. How about his adoption of children, including an orphan from Bangladesh w/ myriad health problems. How about the fact that he was the LONE VOICE in Washington criticizing the strategy in Iraq & calling for Rumsfeld’s firing. How about the fact that he’s been to Iraq numerous times himself in order to form the most accurate assessment of the situation. How about the fact that he has two sons on Active Duty. How about the fact that after barely surviving tha horrendous fire on the USS Forrestal he VOLUNTEERED to go to the USS Oriskany and continue flying - that was way above & beyond the call of duty.</p>

<p>And that’s just off the top of my head! There is waaaaay more to John McCain than your erroneous portrayal, and certainly the depth & breadth of his knowledge, character & experience is The Grand Canyon compared to the thimblefull of experience the other candidate has!</p>

<p>You’ve really eroded your credibility w/ that last post (#20).</p>

<p>To further illustrate my assertions, here is the text of a recent speech given by McCain in Meridian, Mississippi during his “Service to America” tour.</p>

<p>Sorry this is so lengthy, but I suppose that the length further emphasizes how much there is to JSM.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Whether McCain’s “memory loss” is actually lying, pandering, or mild cognitive impairment, it’s certainly troubling. I guess pandering is the best hope.</p>

<p>I totally agree with teriwtt’s statement in post #19: “the difference is that when McCain makes those mistakes, it’s hard to know if it’s due to campaign fatigue or some sort of mild dementia due to his age.”</p>

<p>More “memory lapse” examples:</p>

<p>John McCain Has Selective Memory About Global Warming Efforts
[John</a> McCain has selective memory about global warming efforts - Los Angeles Times](<a href=“http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-trailmccain15-2008may15,0,3805854.story]John”>McCain leaves rivals out)</p>

<p>McCain Claims He Knew Iraq War Would Be “Long and Hard and Tough”, Contradicting Pre-War Statements
[Think</a> Progress McCain Claims He Knew Iraq War Would Be ‘Long And Hard And Tough,’ Contradicting Pre-War Statements](<a href=“http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/04/mccain-iraq-easy/]Think”>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/04/mccain-iraq-easy/)</p>

<p>McCain Missed Iran Vote He Attacked Obama for Skipping
[McCain</a> Missed Iran Vote He Attacked Obama For Skipping - Politics on The Huffington Post](<a href=“HuffPost - Breaking News, U.S. and World News | HuffPost”>McCain Missed Iran Vote He Attacked Obama For Skipping | HuffPost Latest News)</p>

<p>Clinton Blasts McCain’s 9th Ward Remarks
(McCain claimed he didn’t remember remarks he made about tearing down the 9th Ward.)
[Washington</a> Wire - WSJ.com : Clinton Blasts McCain’s Ninth Ward Remarks](<a href=“http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/04/24/clinton-blasts-mccains-ninth-ward-remarks/]Washington”>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/04/24/clinton-blasts-mccains-ninth-ward-remarks/)</p>

<p>McCain claims he “supported every investigation” into the government’s role regarding Hurricane Katrina, when in fact he twice voted against an independent commission.
[FactCheck.org:</a> Katrina Kerfuffle](<a href=“http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/katrina_kerfuffle.html]FactCheck.org:”>http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/katrina_kerfuffle.html)</p>

<p>McCain tries to take credit for GI bill he opposed.
[Think</a> Progress Bush And McCain Try To Steal Credit For Webb’s GI Bill That They Consistently Worked To Defeat](<a href=“http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/19/mccain-bush-gi-bill/]Think”>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/19/mccain-bush-gi-bill/)</p>

<p>He also “forgot” the date his divorce became final. If he had forgotten it for a few more weeks, he would have been a bigamist. </p>

<p>bz - that speech did more to prove mini’s characterization than not.</p>

<p>Sheesh - if you were involved in as many and as varied issues as JSM has been over several decades, I’m sure you’d get confused on more than JSM has! Given his lengthy record, I’m quite surprized there aren’t more “slips”!</p>

<p>c45 - how in the world can you claim that a lengthy speech addressing only McCain’s “heritage” prove’s mini’s “claim” that there is nothing more to McCain than his memory & experiences as a POW?? </p>

<p>Also, mapesy, McCain DID support the G.I. Bill in the form that benefits increased as time-in-service increased & included transferability. He certainly can take credit for supporting the G.I. Bill, regardless of the final form.</p>

<p>You gotta get your news from sources other than rabid left-wing rags like “thinkprogress” and “Huffington Post”! A little objectivity is a good thing!</p>

<p>And please take note, when I post links to back up my assertions, I try very hard to use bi-partisan/objective sources. Partisan propaganda undermines one’s credibility on this forum, imo.</p>

<p>This is terribly disturbing to read, lol!</p>

<p>teriwit:

</p>

<p>I haven’t read every post in this thread, but if the insinuation here has something to do with McCain’s age and an accusation of potential dementia (which is what appears to be the case), then that is age discrimination plain and simple (as serious as any other form of discrimination - it should be condemned as such).</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Those sources are just as credible as the WSJ, which I also linked.</p>

<p>the accusation isn’t of potential dementia; it’s of current dementia. He has exhibited signs that cannot be determined whether they’re from a rigorous campaign schedule or not. If they’re not from the campaign schedule, then another explanation needs to be considered. For someone of his age, with those symptoms, dementia would be one of the first things a physician would want to rule out (amongst depression, stress, hardening of the arteries, and a whole laundry list that could explain lapses of memory in someone his age). If it were our loved ones who were exhibiting forgetfulness and lapses of memory, all of us would be encouraging them to meet with their physician for a diagnosis, especially if they were the same age as McCain.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>So that’s even fewer credible sources?
I don’t think you’re helping your case.</p>

<p>With all of John McCain’s genuine experience of the horrors of war, I would like to know why he could not see through the b.s. (I could) about the “need” to take our country into Iraq. </p>

<p>I would also like to know why, seeing as he could soon become the most powerful man in the world, he has made a comment about killing Iranians. Doesn’t he realize how that plays in that country, reinforcing our “Great Satan” image, allowing the Iranian govt. to puff itself up as the protector of its people, fueling the argument that the U.S. is out to destroy Islam. </p>

<p>I know that everyone slips up and makes mistakes, but this comment seems indicative of deeper feelings that indicate a distressing lack of insight into foreign mindsets.</p>

<p>ohn McCain has changed a lot of his major views now that he is the Republican nominee. I guess all politicians do that, and I mean Obama, too.</p>

<p>I am also disturbed that John McCain doesn’t know how to operate a computer. Surely there are others who can do that for him, but I think it says something about his mindset. Shouldn’t he learn how, if only to appear a man of the twenty-first century? Having recently elected a man who hadn’t bothered to visit Europe until he became president, I hope that this time, we can thoroughly vet and come to understand our candidates.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I’m actually not trying to. I don’t care about the analysis–just the facts.</p>

<p>If you’re really interested, you can find dozens and dozens of links for any one of McCain’s “memory lapses.” Several of them can also be found on YouTube, where McCain himself speaks and later contradicts himself.</p>

<p>All I am concerned about is that he knows and remembers the important stuff. We’ve had a President(s) who knew little and remembered nothing, and we honored and revered them, re-elect them, and even follow their orders to our detriment. We have no qualms in keeping who we got now even though many of us question his capacity. </p>

<p>For as many questions that a candidate gets in a short period of time and changes in the world, how does one keep current and remember what one said just a few days ago.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>McCain is a 1-term candidate. That’s why Hillary was trying to submarine Obama. She knew if McCain won then she would be able to run again in 4 years. If Obama won it was likely 8 years and lights out for her. The most important thing to me right now is who McCain choosed as his veep. If he chooses wisely it will allay a lot of the fears about his age. If he chooses well enough there will be some who hope medical problems may shorten his term…</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I couldn’t agree with you any more. I think people are so much more in tune to dementia/Alzheimer’s problems than they were in Reagan’s era. I always thought it was so courageous of Nancy to speak out against their party’s platform, which was so anti-stem cell research. Watching someone decline from this illness compels many to look at it from a different perspective.</p>

<p>^
^^</p>

<p>we just went thru a 9 month long selection process and you are going to vote on the candidate who has the best VP? Why don’t you vote for the VP and forget about who is President. Currently, we got a VP who is actually the President so I guess the process can work.</p>

<p>longprime - I didn’t say I was voting Republican, but you’d better be certain I am very interested and concerned about who he selects as his VP (given his age and health issues) in case he does win.</p>