This was interesting. This should be a gift link.
Just goes to show these āacademic institutionsā are for profit businesses, regardless of the status.
I guess better for enrollment folks to get big bucks than football coaches. At least their role is directly tied to the purported mission of colleges and universities.
But football coaches do too. Many presidents will note that athletics put them on the map.
A non-profit business, particularly one with large fixed costs like a college, still needs to avoid making negative profit if it wants to stay in business.
maximizing income/revenue and maximizing profit are not the same thing.
For one thing Iād point out the increasing number of colleges now offering free tuition to students whose households are below a certain income level.
But those schools still rely upon full pay kids too. And government grants and yes endowments.
Good people deserve the $$ they get. I think itās great they are getting paid for their salesmanship.
? I donāt understand your response. I didnāt say they didnāt deserve it, I was pointing out that maximizing income doesnāt make them āfor profitā organizations.
I understand they are non profits by government definition and tax status but in reality they are anything but - no different than your biggest charities with highly paid execs. We are just talking semantics.
I thought the most interesting part of the article was the information on ED advantage - a topic often debated here. In the embedded article, I found that 1/3 of students from independent schools use ED interesting.
I bet the percentage is even higher amongst the most selective independent schools. That said, I missed the 1/3 stat in the article. Do they cite a source for it?
Say they pulled from Common App data.
Interesting article but I donāt think thereās any thing ānewā here to most of the people that follow it on these forumās⦠the idea that itās in the Times means it will get a broader audience which is a good thing. I will say that the reporting of it was fairly well done (how often do we see misleading or outright incorrect information??). The one data point that stood out to me:
According to Mr. Murphy of Class Action, the number of schools that admit, via early decision, more than 40 percent of the first-year students who enroll has grown nearly 50 percent since 2015. There are 73 now.