If the alleged victim agrees to have sex wth John, two others join in and the alleged victim is against this, the situation changes. If John is encouraging these two guys against her will…
I think the above is how somebody at USC saw the case. I don’t find the case so bizarre. John should have been allowed to defend himself.
This is bizarre to me.
The accuser did not mention the butt slaps originally. Later she did. This is human psychology at work. The story comes out over time…in pieces. This happens all the time. This is how the mind works.
When this happens people think the accuser is making things up.
No. The accuser is not necessarily making things up.
In this case, there were butt slaps. They weren’t soft gentle ones either.
What about this?
There are cases where the accused says he or she didn’t get due process.
Is John’s case going to set a precedent for future cases?