<p>
</p>
<p>I think that is good counsel we should all consider when commenting on the actions of others, especially when we know so little about the circumstances of the case. Which leads me to: </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Agreed. The only question is where you draw the line. Some have commented he got a harsh/light sentence. Did he have child porn in his possession as in photos of kids or compromising photographs of a teenage girlfriend who may have been 16 or 17 at the time of the photos? </p>
<p>As a side note, I don’t know to what extent parents of “my generation” understand or appreciate the level and frequency of “sexting” as in sexual phone messages/images have become common among even middle school children and certainly quite common well into high school. It was news to both my wife and I when we recieved a notice from the High School our kids attend explaining the crack down on cell phone use and “abuse”.</p>
<p>I think most adults would consider the images present on those phones child pornography and could result in some serious trouble for the owner of that phone especially if they are over 18 and receive an image from a minor.</p>