<p>I don’t really see a winning move for MIT. They can take the series down and face complaints from people who want to take the course (understandable), or leave them up and receive complaints that they’re “enabling” his improper conduct. From a game theory perspective, MIT made the right choice, although is sucks that our society forced them to make the decision in the first place. There hasn’t even been any criminal charges brought against him, and even if there were, I don’t believe that one bad deed automatically invalidates a whole career of brilliant contributions.</p>