MIT Student: Must Be Math Prodigy?

<p>@mobile: It’s curious that you refer to MIT professors as “employees”; though correct, it’s not a common description of them. However, it is a nice way to minimize Quillen and Douglass’ association with MIT.</p>

<p>“Even though I always complain about how ridiculously easy MIT math courses can get, I always thought that they had one of the strongest undergraduate student bodies for mathematics.”</p>

<p>What do you know about the MIT curriculum? Aren’t you the same guy who was bragging about doing lemma-delta proofs?</p>

<p>How many usernames has this guy had now? He was doing this the <em>first</em> time I was on CC, before my over-a-year-long break from the site.</p>

<p>Go away, dude, you’re not even a fun ■■■■■ by this point.</p>

<p>Or maybe I am being unfair to him. Maybe there are actually that many different ■■■■■■ who make repetitive posts in the MIT forum about the relative number of Harvard and MIT Fields Medal winners.</p>

<p>Must be a ■■■■■.</p>

<p>Let’s see…

</p>

<p>Anyone remember poxpox from April 2007?
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/3917661-post42.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/3917661-post42.html&lt;/a&gt;

</p>

<p>Good call, jessiehl.</p>