dstark,
One of the frustrating things about this story is that the “facts” vary a lot in different accounts.
First, we have the mother’s version. It got picked up by CNN and that’s why it blew up. United responded saying the parents bought a seat for a disabled child in coach while they flew in business class. So, reacting to United’s version, public sentiment about this rapidly changed.
Mom then says that’s not true. We got seats for frequent flier miles. We only got upgraded when we arrived at the airport. The group got 12 biz and 4 economy and United determined how they were split up. Some family members switched with us so that we could sit with our kids. So, to me it sounds as if Ivy and one or both of her parents were given tickets in economy.
It “sounds” as if the family left an empty seat in economy and that was Ivy’s ticketed seat. If that’s the case, well United’s misunderstanding about the purchase is understandable,IMO.
I now understand–and admit that I didn’t before–that the problem wasn’t whether Ivy and her mom sat in biz or economy. She can’t sit up and it would be an issue either way. If Ivy had had an empty seat right next to her mom, mom still wouldn’t have wanted to put her in it. So, I assume that nobody volunteered to switch seats to get the plane off the ground because they realized making such an offer wouldn’t solve the problem.
Then…the solution. Some accounts suggest that the child was placed lying down over the laps of her father and another relative and buckled in. Other accounts say there was an empty seat next to the dad. The pilot suggested putting Ivy into the empty seat, fastening her into the seat belt, and having her put her head onto her father’s lap, since she couldn’t sit up. If it’s the latter, that’s closer to dealing with the safety issue because the child was strapped in for take off and landing and the FA’s demand that she be in her own seat for take off and landing was satisfied.
Ivy is over 2 years of age and weighs about 25 pounds. It isn’t safe for her to sit on a lap during take off and landing. And, it isn’t unsafe just for her, but also for anyone else who might get injured if she went flying through the air.
The “we’ve always gotten away with this, so why now?” defense doesn’t “play” well. When is the last time Ivy flew? Maybe the earlier flights were long enough ago that most FAs ASSUMED she was under 2. But in the photos now, she doesn’t look under 2. The fact that she is “developmentally” 6 months, as the mom says, is a tragedy. None of us deny that. But that doesn’t make it safe for her to sit on a lap during take off and landing.
I know that United has “apologized,” but I get the impression it has also informed this family that it won’t be flying on United again unless Ivy is placed in an appropriate safety seat.
At many hospitals now, when a new born and mom go home, the car taking them home has to have a car seat properly installed and it has to have been inspected by the hospital before baby is released. The hospital will not allow new mommies to take a taxi home unless they have brought a car seat and it is properly installed.
It’s not an excuse that you “didn’t know.”
So why is it an excuse that a wealthy family traveling by air “didn’t know?”
If Ivy had been injured during take off and landing, would the parents have blamed United saying that it failed to inform them that holding her on mom’s lap was unsafe?
The real failure here was that the parents failed to bring a safe seat for their child—not that an FA lacked “compassion.”