<p>here is what i remember from mine</p>
<p>wenner is against her theory of migration because it suggests that migration is INTENTIONAL - i’m pretty sure about this one, since he compared butterfly migration to human migration, and said that they’re not the same thing
wenner’s attitude is dismissive
open field = unobstructed
‘mapping out the course’ - painstaking nature of the endeavor
all encompassing skepticism for one of them, don’t remember the question
‘vanishing bearings’ - statistical data is flawed (not sure if that’s right, could have been the other wind one, but i feel since she said they were trying to fly against the wind, then that still suggests they don’t follow wind patterns…so statistical data made more sense)
if wenner criticizes the other person (cant remember her name…), then she would say the pattern was observational
following the ‘morning’ sun - in the perspective of the clock-body altered butterflies</p>