<p>this for for those of you who are interested in details.</p>
<hr>
<p>My last chemo infusion was last Friday. According to the original game plan, the scan is due in three weeks to be followed by a post chemo consultation. </p>
<p>I requested a consultation with Dr yesterday to explore the option of maintaining the treatment while I am waiting for the scan results. My logic was, I started this whole journey with the worst diagnosis with the most aggressive kind of cancer, with a sub optimal surgery result leaving a rather sizable tumor behind which did not shrink much last time we checked (mid chemo). The betting man in me tells me that I should err on the side of overdoing it rather than under doing it. If the scan three weeks down the road reveals that I still need more treatment, I will not have given my cancer a nice vacation by continuing with another 3 weeks of chemo. </p>
<p>He strongly recommended against it. He said, there is no evidence that chemo beyond 6 cycles (18 weeks) have meaningful marginal advantage, and if it failed to get rid of everything, one more cycle (of three weeks) wont do much more. Meanwhile, even though I may not be experiencing overt side effects, he does not want to stress the bone marrow beyond whats necessary: with too much chemo, bone marrow gives out, and eventually stops responding to shots designed to boost white blood counts (this effect can be permanent) so that you can stay on the treatment plan. So, I guess I should protect my bone marrow in case I need further treatment in the future. Statistically speaking, the recurrence rate for patients with my diagnosis is close to 100% within five years. So as much as I am optimistic, I should also hedge my bets and preserve as much vital resource as I can.</p>
<p>So, no more treatment for now.</p>
<p>However, I requested that we do PET scan ASAP rather than wait three weeks. If I need further treatment, I dont want to give my cancer any nice long break. If I were to go into remission, the scan should be already clear: it won be false positive now that would have been completely clear in two weeks. </p>
<p>He agreed. Also, originally, he ordered CT scan only, but I also talked him into prescribing combined CT/PET scan so that in case the solid mass is still there, we can get much better idea whether its active cancer or not. That said, even PET scan has false negative, so we will never know for sure. (CT scan just shows the mass. it does not what it is: cancerous or not. PET lights up if there is unusual metabolic activity - mostly caused by cancer, but other things can cause that too). So, here are potential scenarios when the scan results come out.</p>
<p>(1) CT scan show no more tumor, and PET scan does not light up (with cancer): I am officially in remission. I now join the civilian population. Instead of being a cancer patient, I become a mental patient, perpetually paranoid about every single odd sensation and wondering whether this is a sign of recurrence or not.</p>
<p>(2) CT scan still shows the mass. PET scan is negative. Even though the odds are good that the mass is no long an active cancer tumor, the question still lingers (there are false negative PET scan results too). If the mass is now easily accessible via needle biopsy, he may do that and confirm once and for all, whether its cancerous or not.</p>
<p>(3) CT scan shows the mass. PET scan is also positive (lights up). This does not necessarily mean its cancer (PET scan is a false positive). If needle biopsy is possible, Dr. S will do that. If its not cancer, I go back to scenario (1) above. If its cancer, now we have further choices.</p>
<p>a. If its operable now (before last December, it was not operable). So, we do surgery. It may involve bowel resection. It could be a major surgery. Do I get a discount as a repeat customer?</p>
<p>b. We do radiation. Its daily entertainment for 4-7 weeks. I hear its a lot of fun. I finally get to experience the full repertoire of cancer arsenals: cutting & sewing, poisoning and now burning. </p>
<p>(4) CT scan shows now not only the previous mass, but something else disease progression. This is the worst scenario. If this happens, we start a fun game of treasure hunt most powerful and effective combination of drugs are no longer working (some cancers become resistant to the chemo drugs), so we start a random search of a new combination of drugs that might work and try them and see if they work, if not, repeat. I will finally know what it feels like to be a woman with a very odd body shape who cant find the right outfit no matter what she tries on in a fashionable boutique. </p>
<p>I think the odds are best for the scenario (1) or (2) (non cancerous mass): my cancer marker has come down again and now well within a normal range. I dont think scenario (4) is likely at all, though I can never be certain. </p>
<p>No matter what happens, I am prepared for all possibilities, and I will solider on. I have run these scenarios so many times in my head with all contingencies silently articulated they do not scare me anymore. Even the bad scenarios lost their frightening edge as I played them repeatedly as if they were business case simulation studies. There is something to be said about “objectifying” one’s situation.</p>
<p>Hey, I already crossed a major mile stone: completion of the pretty harsh chemo regimen without any side effects (other than hair falling out and white blood count tanking). I have already beaten the odds with a wide margin. This has to mean something for me going forward. If I do get into remission now, my prognosis should improve even further. With my diagnosis, getting into remission so easily with just a standard front line therapy is not a given AT ALL many women dont achieve the remission status so handily with my kind of diagnosis.</p>
<p>So, this is it for now. I will let you know again when the PET scan results are out (next week).</p>