<p>Well perhaps we should eliminate all mids/cadets from post grad scholarship programs - Rhodes, Fullbright etc. Why should they be allowed to go to gradschool right after commissioning instead of serving. We are in a time of war - why are we sending these kids off to learn instead of serve?</p>
<p>One could make the case that law school will be there - as well as other grad school programs and the 5 year committment should come first. With athletics - the opportunity won’t always be there. This is not the 1940’s anymore - if an athlete has to wait 5 years without training for the sport specifically then he will find his opportunity is long gone. </p>
<p>While I don’t think we see an exodus from the academies at the two year mark so one can attend law school - we may be seeing our top athletes leave, if their ability grows while at the academy- if only to keep their options open.
BTW - I don’t agree that academy athletes should be forgiven their obligation to serve in order to play pro sports - USNA69 was not saying that either.<br>
USNA69 was remarking on other posts attacking the mid’s character.<br>
There have been numerous instances of athletes in our academies who excel beyond all expectations after they arrive. Many athletes are still developing and maturing. This ball player was approached and offered an opportunity. Accomadations have been given before - there is a precedence. While I agree with the decision I empathize and don’t begrudge the athlete for making the inquiry.</p>
<p>Apparently, there is a young swimmer who will show up for I-Day and that evening be whisked away to participate in the Olympic swimming trials - should this accommodation be given?</p>