<p>The problem with this type or analysis is that the inclusion or exclusion of words is as silly as it is subjective. </p>
<p>From the first list, there is no reason to include words such as</p>
<p>duplicity, elusive, enigma, indigenous, inquisition, meticulous, plausible, pristine, pulverize, slight, unaffected, unconventional, analogy, anecdote, benign, circumspect, colloquial, decorum, discerning, eclectic, emphatic, enmity, erroneous, illicit, misnomer, ornate, paradox, penchant, permeate, prolific, rebuttal, resolute, reconciling, </p>
<p>From the second list …</p>
<p>appalled, charismatic, complicity, empathize, exonerate, nostalgic, provisional, rampant, ruthless, spare, ubiquitous, vanguard, watershed, apocryphal, cerebral, coin, curtail, disparage, elation, exemplary, foreboding, ludicrous, profound, sanguine, steadfast, severity, visceral </p>
<p>Now, run your analysis again!</p>