<p>I don’t have a problem disagreeing with you. I object to giving back my 2001 & 2003 tax cuts when those below $250,000 apparently will get to keep theirs and on top of that being singled out to pay for a new welfare program that I do not consider a human right.</p>
<p>If I see a predominance of middle classers saying I want my taxes raised to pay for universal care, we can talk, but I don’t see anything near that for a statement that has a positive reporting bias.</p>
<p>We can discuss the provision of universal care on the idea that most First World nations have something similar but not before we solve the cost issue. To implement mandated coverage with such an inefficient system at a time when the government budget is highly constrained strikes me as worse than the alternative inertial default.</p>