<p>
</p>
<p>I thought you were arguing with yourself but apparently not, so I will answer you. It also appears that, by some, at least, your own post could be considered an attempt at the last word.</p>
<p>First off, the discussion here is about a Senatorial nomination in a state where the competition is most likely not such that the names must be divided. The candidate more than likely will be able to apply to both Senators and also his Congressman. Also he is not missing his primary chance at nomination, his local Congressman. The odds of him not getting at least an alternate are very slim. Also the odds of him getting a primary, if this is the selection method, from his Senator, and nothing from his Congressman are even less likely. </p>
<p>Secondly, we are talking about a very important part of the admissions process, not a “sightseeing trip”. It was this description, along with the comment that the advise has become parents vs candidates, that has caused me to weigh in. The Admissions Board ensures that those accepted have the academic credentials to make it through. The unknown is the desire of the candidates themselves. Knowing what they are facing is a huge part of this. CVW is probably the most important tool which they can utilize to ascertain their future. Additionally, the sooner the better, where it can be a part of their initial decision process, when they are most influenced. So yes, the parents may want their kids in an Academy, not really concerned with what they will be facing, while the candidates themselves are more pragmatic, desirous of real information. NASS is an artificial environment. CVW is the real thing. I would never, with very few exceptions, recommend a candidate accept an appointment without having attended CVW.</p>
<p>Additionally, most candidates look better on paper than they do in person. Not being negative, but most are not polished interviewees. Most boards realize this, I think, and, in my opinion, few candidates either “make it” or “break it” based solely on the interview. Therefore, a legitimate opportunity to have the record go before a board without the interview should not be seen necessarily as a negative.</p>
<p>Lastly, the Academy desires the most qualified candidates. If a candidate, in the quest to become the most qualified candidate possible, made the decision to attend CVW and missed his sole chance at a nomination, and is a candidate in the top 1500 or so, which the Academy desires, they will probably work with his three MOCs after the fact to attain a nomination.</p>
<p>Each case is different and no blanket statements should be made. However, in this case I feel the candidate has a valid concern.</p>